5 Comments
Sep 20·edited Sep 20Liked by Alex Finley

Last week I raised the point that there is an 'incitement of violence' exception to the First Amendment free speech, it stemmed from an Ohio case, it's appalling that a sitting Senator of Ohio is targeting his own constituents with false and inflammatory rhetoric. I received a very thoughtful reply that pointed out "where's the undefined line?" and that seems to sum up just about everything we've been witnessing with the recent criminal activities of the former President and our Judicial system, if there isn't a definitive line how can he possibly have crossed it? But he did, IMO, there is definitely a line crossed with this September WH prohibited air space violation;

https://youtu.be/N8bQY02SEBc?si=spW_bh8un8BtTT1z

Expand full comment

Do you think the secret nature of some of the information plays a role? It was really helpful for there to be emails from Tenet. But then there are other times that it’s obvious to anyone with a functioning brain cell and… it makes no difference

Expand full comment
author

Not sure I understand the question. Is it the clandestine relationship that makes the difference? Yes, probably

Expand full comment

Sorry it was badly expressed. I was more thinking of how concrete evidence, like emails, are not available all the time: assuming the IC even has it, they probably don’t want to share.

Expand full comment
author

Yeah, getting the evidence is hard. Proving the relationship even harder

Expand full comment